It is true that the bombing of Yemen might signal the arrival of the era of activism by regional powers, in which these powers will likely take on the responsibility of managing regional affairs. However, beyond that, the Yemen bombing actually does not have any other positive implications.

As is evident, external military intervention has not solved problems in the past several decades and has in fact caused more problems. The Gulf War targeted a conventional threat and was untaken for a limited purpose: to drive back an invasion. The success of the Gulf War does not mean that its model can be applied to dealing with non-conventional threats. Even overthrowing regimes by military means has proven to be too high a target.

It is also evident that non-military intervention can likewise cause problems. Political and material support for the Syrian opposition from several outside parties and states only intensified tensions, which in turn produced more humanitarian problems.

European militaries overthrew Libya's Muammar Qaddafi four years ago, but since then they have had to deal with refugees pouring into European countries via the Mediterranean. The radicalization of these immigrants has also become a serious threat in Europe. Lurid media reports of the Bashar al-Assad regime's persecution of Syrian Sunni Muslims in 2011-2012 encouraged Sunni Muslims from all over the world, particularly from Europe, to go to Syria to fight with the opposition, but these fighters later became the backbone of the Islamic State group.

All in all, intervention by external powers has caused more problems than it has solved, while intervention in the name of humanitarian concerns has produced more humanitarian crises.

Regional powers do need to take more responsibility in tackling regional issues. It is believed that the lack of regionalism, which is defined by a strong role for regional powers, is actually one of the reasons behind turmoil in the Middle East. But regional powers' intervention into the domestic affairs of other regional countries will prove to be just as disastrous as intervention by external powers.

The Middle East has already become turbulent enough as ISIS grows in strength and refugees spread across borders. It is reasonable to assume that as tensions in Yemen grow, more refugees will flee beyond their country's borders. The bombing of Yemen will therefore only add oil to the flames.

One negative implication of the bombing of Yemen is that other regional powers might also learn from this example of solving problems with military means. If so, the region will become more dangerous. The region is full of not only sectarian and tribal conflicts but also of competition for spheres of influence. This bombing will likely encourage countries in the region to strengthen their military capabilities and even to use military means to address their problems and concerns. That is not good news for the region.

To sum up, the Middle East does need a kind of regionalism, one in which regional powers take on the responsibility of managing regional affairs in a negotiated, diplomatic, coordinated and peaceful way. Militarization will only exacerbate rather than solve the region's problems.

The writer is a columnist with China.org.cn. For more information please visit: http://china.org.cn/opinion/jinliangxiang.htm

Opinion articles reflect the views of their authors, not necessarily those of China.org.cn