少妇无码精品23p_亚洲一区无码电影在线观看网站 _悠悠色一区二区_中文字幕亚洲无码第36页

Home / English Column / Business (new) / In Industry / Real Estate Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read
Debate over Property Tax Heats up
Adjust font size:

As the government's latest wave of macro-control measures aimed at the housing sector unfolds, the debate about the immovable property tax is once again surfacing.

 

Although experts and analysts generally agree that the proposed tax could, to some extent, curb property speculation and rein in rising prices, and be applied sooner, they are divergent on how it should be levied.

 

Taxation policy has long been viewed as an effective tool to adjust the real estate market.

 

In a State Council executive meeting on May 17, the central government vowed to use a mix of credit, tax and land policy to cool the currently overheated housing market.

 

As of June 1, a 5.5 percent transaction tax is now being charged to people who sell their property within five years of purchase a policy many say is designed to discourage investment-oriented property demand.

 

But many experts say the immovable property tax, which is imposed on owners of properties, is more effective than the transaction tax to restrain property speculation.

 

"The property tax is an indispensable instrument to drive out excessive housing demand resulting from speculation and investment purposes," said Yi Xianrong, a researcher with the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences.

 

The property tax would increase property investors' costs, which would make some think twice before investing in property, Yi explained.

 

And some experts say the property tax could also help drive down housing prices.

 

Currently the land fee, which some estimate accounts for 40 percent of developers' costs, is calculated into construction costs, an arrangement that experts say leads to high property prices.

 

The developers will not have to pay the land fee if the property tax is levied, which is likely to result in the property price falling, experts say.

 

However, there are concerns that although homebuyers will pay less for property, they will have to pay more to maintain their houses, as they will have to pay the tax.

 

"It (the imposition of immovable property tax) will become a little bit easier for people to buy houses, but it will likely make it harder to maintain them," said a researcher with the Development Research Center (DRC), a government think tank.

 

"So the tax regime should be designed carefully in order not to add unbearable costs on to ordinary homeowners," the researcher added, declining to be named.

 

But experts are divided about how and when the proposed tax should be levied, such as on which property types the tax should be levied.

 

All household residential properties should be included in the tax category, according to a research paper on immovable property tax released by a cabinet-affiliated think tank last week.

 

The paper, jointly prepared by the DRC of the State Council and the US Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, a non-profit organization, proposed that a certain amount of household residential property should be exempted from the tax, in a bid to avoid adding to the living expenses of homebuyers.

 

The paper also proposed that properties used by government, military and diplomatic establishments, and other public property, should be exempted from the property tax.

 

And land used for agriculture and farmers' living quarters should also be exempted from the property tax, according to the research paper, which recommends the immovable property tax rate be set between 0.3 percent and 0.8 percent.

 

In comparison, in Vancouver, Canada, where property tax is a main source of local revenue, the property tax rate is set between 0.3 percent and 36 percent.

 

The differential tax rate is designed to keep the income gap from widening.

 

Property tax will be reduced by 30 percent to 50 percent for properties used by those older than 65, or retired servicemen or disabled people. Tax on other types of properties will be higher than 10 percent.

 

But some experts believe that the immovable property tax should largely be targeting those high-earners, "as this tax is an important means to balance the income gap," said Yin Bocheng, a researcher with the Finance Studies Centre at Fudan University.

 

In Vancouver, a much higher tax rate is applied on the second homes of its local citizens.

 

Properties for rental, villas and high-end apartments should be the first batch of properties to be levied with the immovable property tax, suggested Jia Kang, a researcher with a Ministry of Finance-affiliated research institute.

 

Though disagreement remains on taxable properties, experts agree that an adequate infrastructure should be put in place first if the property tax is to be well-implemented and effective.

 

"Before the tax is levied, there should be some basic infrastructure such as a detailed and accurate property registration database and a scientific land valuation method," said Yi Xianrong.

 

"Only when these preparations are done can the property tax be implemented efficiently," said Yi.

 

"The imposition of immovable property tax is a very complex issue," Xie Fuzhan, deputy director of the DRC, said at a symposium last week. "Only with good design can we reduce any possible glitches when the tax is really applied."

 

However, the need for prudence and adequate infrastructure should not constitute an excuse to indefinitely delay the imposition of immovable property tax, Yi stressed.

 

(China Daily June 6, 2006)

Debate over Property Tax Heats up

 

As the government's latest wave of macro-control measures aimed at the housing sector unfolds, the debate about the immovable property tax is once again surfacing.

 

Although experts and analysts generally agree that the proposed tax could, to some extent, curb property speculation and rein in rising prices, and be applied sooner, they are divergent on how it should be levied.

 

Taxation policy has long been viewed as an effective tool to adjust the real estate market.

 

In a State Council executive meeting on May 17, the central government vowed to use a mix of credit, tax and land policy to cool the currently overheated housing market.

 

As of June 1, a 5.5 percent transaction tax is now being charged to people who sell their property within five years of purchase a policy many say is designed to discourage investment-oriented property demand.

 

But many experts say the immovable property tax, which is imposed on owners of properties, is more effective than the transaction tax to restrain property speculation.

 

"The property tax is an indispensable instrument to drive out excessive housing demand resulting from speculation and investment purposes," said Yi Xianrong, a researcher with the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences.

 

The property tax would increase property investors' costs, which would make some think twice before investing in property, Yi explained.

 

And some experts say the property tax could also help drive down housing prices.

 

Currently the land fee, which some estimate accounts for 40 percent of developers' costs, is calculated into construction costs, an arrangement that experts say leads to high property prices.

 

The developers will not have to pay the land fee if the property tax is levied, which is likely to result in the property price falling, experts say.

 

However, there are concerns that although homebuyers will pay less for property, they will have to pay more to maintain their houses, as they will have to pay the tax.

 

"It (the imposition of immovable property tax) will become a little bit easier for people to buy houses, but it will likely make it harder to maintain them," said a researcher with the Development Research Center (DRC), a government think tank.

 

"So the tax regime should be designed carefully in order not to add unbearable costs on to ordinary homeowners," the researcher added, declining to be named.

 

But experts are divided about how and when the proposed tax should be levied, such as on which property types the tax should be levied.

 

All household residential properties should be included in the tax category, according to a research paper on immovable property tax released by a cabinet-affiliated think tank last week.

 

The paper, jointly prepared by the DRC of the State Council and the US Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, a non-profit organization, proposed that a certain amount of household residential property should be exempted from the tax, in a bid to avoid adding to the living expenses of homebuyers.

 

The paper also proposed that properties used by government, military and diplomatic establishments, and other public property, should be exempted from the property tax.

 

And land used for agriculture and farmers' living quarters should also be exempted from the property tax, according to the research paper, which recommends the immovable property tax rate be set between 0.3 percent and 0.8 percent.

 

In comparison, in Vancouver, Canada, where property tax is a main source of local revenue, the property tax rate is set between 0.3 percent and 36 percent.

 

The differential tax rate is designed to keep the income gap from widening.

 

Property tax will be reduced by 30 percent to 50 percent for properties used by those older than 65, or retired servicemen or disabled people. Tax on other types of properties will be higher than 10 percent.

 

But some experts believe that the immovable property tax should largely be targeting those high-earners, "as this tax is an important means to balance the income gap," said Yin Bocheng, a researcher with the Finance Studies Centre at Fudan University.

 

In Vancouver, a much higher tax rate is applied on the second homes of its local citizens.

 

Properties for rental, villas and high-end apartments should be the first batch of properties to be levied with the immovable property tax, suggested Jia Kang, a researcher with a Ministry of Finance-affiliated research institute.

 

Though disagreement remains on taxable properties, experts agree that an adequate infrastructure should be put in place first if the property tax is to be well-implemented and effective.

 

"Before the tax is levied, there should be some basic infrastructure such as a detailed and accurate property registration database and a scientific land valuation method," said Yi Xianrong.

 

"Only when these preparations are done can the property tax be implemented efficiently," said Yi.

 

"The imposition of immovable property tax is a very complex issue," Xie Fuzhan, deputy director of the DRC, said at a symposium last week. "Only with good design can we reduce any possible glitches when the tax is really applied."

 

However, the need for prudence and adequate infrastructure should not constitute an excuse to indefinitely delay the imposition of immovable property tax, Yi stressed.

 

(China Daily June 6, 2006)

 

Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read

Related Stories
Property Tax Surge Ebbs
Shanghai to Tax Real Estate Speculators
?
SiteMap | About Us | RSS | Newsletter | Feedback
SEARCH THIS SITE
Copyright ? China.org.cn. All Rights Reserved ????E-mail: webmaster@china.org.cn Tel: 86-10-88828000 京ICP證 040089號(hào)
精品视频在线观看免费| 韩国三级视频网站| 亚洲 国产精品 日韩| 91麻豆精品国产综合久久久| 久久精品欧美一区二区| 国产精品免费久久| 欧美a级成人淫片免费看| 午夜激情视频在线播放| 天天色成人网| 日韩欧美一二三区| 国产激情视频在线观看| 久久精品免视看国产成人2021| 黄色短视屏| 成人a大片高清在线观看| 国产成人欧美一区二区三区的| 黄视频网站免费| 韩国三级香港三级日本三级la| 国产一区二区福利久久| 国产91视频网| 欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 国产网站在线| 日本伦理黄色大片在线观看网站| 亚洲精品影院久久久久久| 黄色短视屏| 成人高清视频在线观看| 国产欧美精品| 韩国毛片免费大片| 日韩字幕在线| 亚洲 国产精品 日韩| 日韩免费片| 一级毛片视频播放| 国产网站免费观看| 国产高清在线精品一区二区| 精品美女| 免费国产在线观看| 国产欧美精品| 青草国产在线| 国产不卡在线观看视频| 国产极品白嫩美女在线观看看| 高清一级毛片一本到免费观看| 欧美激情一区二区三区视频 | 日韩av东京社区男人的天堂| 成人高清视频免费观看| 99热视热频这里只有精品| 99久久精品国产国产毛片 | 天天做人人爱夜夜爽2020| 国产视频久久久久| 国产a视频| 亚洲 男人 天堂| 精品视频在线观看一区二区| 亚洲精品久久玖玖玖玖| 国产一区二区高清视频| 久久国产一区二区| 二级特黄绝大片免费视频大片| 久草免费资源| 日本乱中文字幕系列| 国产网站免费在线观看| 韩国三级香港三级日本三级la| 国产麻豆精品免费密入口| 999久久狠狠免费精品| 欧美一级视频免费| 精品在线视频播放| 成人影视在线播放| 色综合久久久久综合体桃花网| 久久99中文字幕久久| 国产一区二区精品久久91| 久久精品免视看国产成人2021| 欧美夜夜骑 青草视频在线观看完整版 久久精品99无色码中文字幕 欧美日韩一区二区在线观看视频 欧美中文字幕在线视频 www.99精品 香蕉视频久久 | 久久精品大片| 亚洲wwwwww| 国产麻豆精品hdvideoss| 欧美日本免费| 国产精品自拍在线观看| 九九精品久久久久久久久| 麻豆系列 在线视频| 国产成人啪精品| 久久99中文字幕| 麻豆网站在线看| 一级片免费在线观看视频| 成人av在线播放| 午夜精品国产自在现线拍| 你懂的日韩| 日韩专区一区| 精品国产一区二区三区久| 中文字幕97| 一级毛片视频在线观看| 99久久精品国产国产毛片 | 国产视频一区二区在线观看| 日本免费看视频| 国产视频久久久久| 精品视频在线观看一区二区三区| 日韩一级黄色| 国产麻豆精品免费视频| 精品毛片视频| 成人免费一级纶理片| 日韩在线观看免费完整版视频| 欧美激情一区二区三区在线播放| 久久久成人网| 亚洲精品中文一区不卡 | 91麻豆tv| 国产视频在线免费观看| 国产麻豆精品| 日本在线不卡免费视频一区| 国产网站在线| 国产极品精频在线观看| 国产91视频网| 精品国产香蕉在线播出 | 欧美激情一区二区三区视频高清| a级毛片免费全部播放| 欧美国产日韩久久久| 精品视频免费观看| 日韩欧美一及在线播放| 欧美a免费| 久久精品店| 日本特黄特黄aaaaa大片| 一级毛片视频免费| 美国一区二区三区| 日韩在线观看免费完整版视频| 久久国产精品自线拍免费| 国产不卡高清在线观看视频| 久久国产影院| 四虎影视精品永久免费网站| 成人高清视频免费观看| 成人av在线播放| 97视频免费在线观看| 久久久久久久网| 日本免费看视频| 青青久久精品| 欧美大片aaaa一级毛片| 欧美夜夜骑 青草视频在线观看完整版 久久精品99无色码中文字幕 欧美日韩一区二区在线观看视频 欧美中文字幕在线视频 www.99精品 香蕉视频久久 | 日本免费看视频| 国产一级生活片| 成人影院久久久久久影院| 日本免费乱人伦在线观看 | 国产伦久视频免费观看 视频| 欧美激情一区二区三区视频| 日韩在线观看网站| 欧美另类videosbestsex久久| 午夜久久网| 国产a免费观看| 欧美大片a一级毛片视频| 午夜在线亚洲男人午在线| 国产一级生活片| 人人干人人插| 欧美夜夜骑 青草视频在线观看完整版 久久精品99无色码中文字幕 欧美日韩一区二区在线观看视频 欧美中文字幕在线视频 www.99精品 香蕉视频久久 | 欧美激情一区二区三区在线| 韩国毛片免费| 久久精品大片| 国产一区二区精品在线观看| 精品视频免费看| 欧美爱色| 九九热国产视频| 成人免费观看视频| 黄色短视屏| 国产激情视频在线观看| 国产一区二区福利久久| 欧美夜夜骑 青草视频在线观看完整版 久久精品99无色码中文字幕 欧美日韩一区二区在线观看视频 欧美中文字幕在线视频 www.99精品 香蕉视频久久 | 欧美一区二区三区性| 久久99中文字幕| 色综合久久手机在线| 国产不卡福利| 精品久久久久久综合网| 人人干人人插| 九九免费高清在线观看视频| 亚洲精品影院一区二区| 亚洲第一色在线| 精品国产一区二区三区国产馆| 九九久久国产精品大片| 午夜在线亚洲| 免费一级片在线| 99久久网站| 日韩avdvd| 国产亚洲精品aaa大片| 成人高清视频免费观看| 可以在线看黄的网站| 国产91丝袜高跟系列| 在线观看成人网| 日韩中文字幕一区二区不卡| 欧美另类videosbestsex视频| 可以免费看毛片的网站| 日韩一级黄色大片| 99色精品| 久久久久久久网| 欧美夜夜骑 青草视频在线观看完整版 久久精品99无色码中文字幕 欧美日韩一区二区在线观看视频 欧美中文字幕在线视频 www.99精品 香蕉视频久久 | 高清一级淫片a级中文字幕 | 国产欧美精品| 久久久久久久网| 日本伦理片网站| 久久成人性色生活片| 九九九国产| 久久国产一区二区| 日韩中文字幕在线播放| 亚洲女初尝黑人巨高清在线观看| 国产a免费观看| 欧美另类videosbestsex| 精品视频在线观看视频免费视频| 国产精品1024永久免费视频| 国产一区二区精品久| 九九精品在线播放| 久草免费在线视频|